Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 48.8 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Gigabyte | Samsung |
| Android 4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 4.96 x 2.44 x 0.39 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.27 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 165.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6572 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1300 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-400 (Dual-Core 500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.27 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1400mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 150 hours standby time 4.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.12 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 is much better than the GIGABYTE GSmart T4, getting an 83.3 score against 48.8. The Galaxy S9 construction is somewhat thinner but a lot heavier than GIGABYTE GSmart T4. The Samsung Galaxy S9 features a better looking screen than GIGABYTE GSmart T4, because it has a much bigger display, a much better pixels number per inch in the screen and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2960.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a better performing CPU than GIGABYTE GSmart T4, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with more RAM and a larger number of cores (and they are faster). Samsung Galaxy S9 has a very superior camera than GIGABYTE GSmart T4, because it has a camera in the back with a way better 12 MP resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S9 features much more storage capacity for apps and games than GIGABYTE GSmart T4, because it has 60 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 400 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a much longer battery lifetime than GIGABYTE GSmart T4, because it has a 114% more battery size.
The Galaxy S9 not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.