Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 44 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Gigabyte | Samsung |
| Android 4.0 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 4.88 x 2.50 x 0.46 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.41 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green, Orange and White | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 203 (245 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.74 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.83 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 225 hours standby time 7 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 is a lot better than GIGABYTE GSmart Tuku T2, having a score of 83.3 against 44. Galaxy S9's construction is incredibly thinner but heavier than the GIGABYTE GSmart Tuku T2. Galaxy S9 features a sharper display than GIGABYTE GSmart Tuku T2, because it has a way better 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution, a really bigger screen and a lot better pixels density.
The Galaxy S9 features a much greater storage to store more games and applications than GIGABYTE GSmart Tuku T2, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 400 GB. The Galaxy S9 counts with a lot better performance than GIGABYTE GSmart Tuku T2, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
The Galaxy S9 has a greater camera than GIGABYTE GSmart Tuku T2, because it has a back-facing camera with lot more MP. The Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than GIGABYTE GSmart Tuku T2, because it has a 100 percent greater battery size.
The Galaxy S9 costs a little more than the GIGABYTE GSmart Tuku T2, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.