Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-10-20 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.79 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 429.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is much better than Google Nexus 5X's 73.7 global score. The LG V50 ThinQ is a notably newer cellphone than the Google Nexus 5X, but it's notably heavier and just a little thicker. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a superior processor than Google Nexus 5X, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of faster cores.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid display than Google Nexus 5X, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3120, a greater quantity of pixels per screen inch and a bigger screen. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Google Nexus 5X, because it has 96 GB more internal memory and an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
LG V50 ThinQ takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Google Nexus 5X, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing lower quality videos and photos, a worse (4K) video resolution and a lesser mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a much bigger aperture to capture better low light photos and videos.
LG V50 ThinQ has a much longer battery life than Google Nexus 5X, because it has a 48 percent greater battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, LG V50 ThinQ is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.