Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2015-10-20 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.79 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 429.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo is slightly better than the Google Nexus 5X, with a 77.9 score against 73.7. Even being the best device in our current comparison, the Motorola DROID Turbo is an older, incredibly thicker and notably heavier device than Google Nexus 5X. Motorola DROID Turbo has a much better screen than Google Nexus 5X, and although they both have a same size screen, the Motorola DROID Turbo also has a greater screen pixel density and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
Motorola DROID Turbo features just a bit better performance than Google Nexus 5X, because although it has lesser CPU cores , it also counts with a GPU and more RAM memory. Motorola DROID Turbo features a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Nexus 5X, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a slightly better camera than Google Nexus 5X, because although it has lower 24 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same diafragm aperture, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a way higher resolution back facing camera.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a much longer battery duration than Google Nexus 5X, because it has a 3900mAh battery size.
Motorola DROID Turbo not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.