Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2015-10-20 | 2019-05-29 |
| 5.79 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 429.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A80 is better than the Google Nexus 5X, with an 84.9 score against 73.7. Samsung Galaxy A80's construction is a lot newer, but notably heavier and somewhat thicker than the Google Nexus 5X. The Google Nexus 5X counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy A80, because although it has a really smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy A80 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Nexus 5X, because it has a greater number of cores and a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A80 has a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Nexus 5X, because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A80 counts with a better camera than Google Nexus 5X, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A80 also has a way higher resolution camera in the back and a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking better quality videos and photos.
The Galaxy A80 features a way better battery lifetime than Google Nexus 5X, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity instead of 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.