Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2015-10-20 | 2017-02-24 |
| 5.79 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black and Gold |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 429.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a global score of 81, which is slightly better than Google Nexus 5X's 73.7 score. Although the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is extremely heavier than the Google Nexus 5X, it's thinner and also newer. Google Nexus 5X counts with a bit better screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 1920 resolution, the Google Nexus 5X also counts with a little higher pixels count in each inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features a bit more powerful CPU than Google Nexus 5X, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores. The Google Nexus 5X has a bit better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a camera with a lot lower 12.3 mega pixels resolution and a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photos, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Nexus 5X, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 256 GB and 32 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy C9 Pro has a very superior battery duration than Google Nexus 5X, because it has a 48% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.