Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-10-20 | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.79 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 429.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X60 Pro is slightly better than the Google Nexus 5X, getting a global score of 78.8 against 73.7. The vivo X60 Pro design is incredibly newer and just a little thinner, but extremely heavier than the Google Nexus 5X. Vivo X60 Pro features a little more vivid display than Google Nexus 5X, because although it has a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a larger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2376px resolution.
The vivo X60 Pro features a better performing CPU than Google Nexus 5X, because it has 10 GB more RAM and 2 more cpu cores. The vivo X60 Pro captures greater videos and photos than Google Nexus 5X, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the vivo X60 Pro also has better video frame rate, a camera in the back with a way better 48 mega pixels resolution, a bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger diafragm aperture.
Vivo X60 Pro has a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Nexus 5X, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a much better battery lifetime than Google Nexus 5X, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.