Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 5.1, 5.0 | -- |
| 2014-10-15 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Blue and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1019.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 490 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is much better than the Google Nexus 6, with a 90.8 score against 79.4. Galaxy Note 20 is a much newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than the Google Nexus 6, but it's just a bit heavier. The Galaxy Note 20 has a little bit better processing power than Google Nexus 6, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with 4 more cpu cores and 5 GB more RAM.
The Google Nexus 6 has a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a little bit better pixels quantity per inch of display. The Galaxy Note 20 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Google Nexus 6, because although it has a lower 12 MP resolution back camera, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality and a bigger aperture.
Galaxy Note 20 features a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Nexus 6, because it has 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has greater battery life than Google Nexus 6, because it has a 34 percent more battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy Note 20 is also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.