Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 5.1, 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-15 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Blue and White | Mystic indigo |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1019.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 490 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6 is slightly better than the Moto G Stylus, having an 81.1 score against 79.7. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Google Nexus 6 has 5.1 version and Moto G Stylus has Android 11. Although Google Nexus 6 is a lot older and somewhat thicker than the Moto G Stylus, it's body is still just a bit lighter.
Google Nexus 6 has a sharper screen than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440px resolution and a little greater screen pixel density. The Google Nexus 6 counts with a little faster processor than Moto G Stylus, because although it has lesser RAM and a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit.
The Moto G Stylus has much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Nexus 6, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. Moto G Stylus has improved battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
The Moto G Stylus counts with a way better camera than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Moto G Stylus also has a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution and a bigger camera aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light environments.
Although Google Nexus 6 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G Stylus. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Google Nexus 6, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Moto G Stylus, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.