Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 5.1, 5.0 | -- |
| 2014-10-15 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1019.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 490 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a little bit better than the Google Nexus 6, with an 85.5 score against 81.1. Xiaomi Pocophone F1's body is notably newer, just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than Google Nexus 6. The Google Nexus 6 counts with a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Nexus 6, because it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB and 256 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a bit superior CPU than Google Nexus 6, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with 4 more cores and a greater amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with better battery performance than Google Nexus 6, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3220mAh. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Google Nexus 6, because although it has a lower video resolution and a lower resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better photos and video in poorly lited environments.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a lot cheaper, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.