Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| 2015-11-02 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 649.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X has a score of 88.1, which is just a bit better than Google Nexus 6P's overall score of 80.3. The iPhone X design is a lot newer and just a bit lighter, but a little bit thicker than Google Nexus 6P. The Apple iPhone X counts with a more powerful processor than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Apple iPhone X also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
Apple iPhone X features a little sharper display than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a bit worse screen pixel density and a little bit lower resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels, it also counts with a little larger display. The iPhone X features a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 128 GB more internal storage.
The iPhone X shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a less megapixels back camera, a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a lot smaller sensor offering a lot lower image quality, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low-light images.
The Google Nexus 6P counts with greater battery life than Apple iPhone X, because it has 3450mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Nexus 6P, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Nexus 6P. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the Google Nexus 6P, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.