Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| 2015-11-02 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 649.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 3, having a score of 80.3 against 80. Google Nexus 6P's construction is a little thinner than the Google Pixel 3, although it is heavier and was released many years before. Google Nexus 6P counts with a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 3, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560, a little bit higher pixel quantity in each display inch and a little bit larger screen.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with a little faster processor than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 3 also has a larger amount of RAM. Google Nexus 6P captures slightly better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Google Nexus 6P also counts with a larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with a higher 12.3 mega pixels resolution.
Google Nexus 6P counts with a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. Google Nexus 6P counts with greater battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has an 18% larger battery capacity.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 3. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the Google Pixel 3, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.