Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| 2015-11-02 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 649.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is a little bit better than Google Nexus 6P, with a general score of 82.9 against 80.3. The Google Pixel 4 XL design is a lot newer than Google Nexus 6P's, but it's just a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with just a bit better performance than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a larger amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a slightly better screen than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a little larger display, a little greater display density and a slightly higher 1440 x 3040 resolution. Google Nexus 6P counts with a much bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has more internal memory capacity.
Google Pixel 4 XL features a bit superior battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 3700mAh battery capacity against 3450mAh. The Google Nexus 6P captures a bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for shooting pictures and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Google Nexus 6P also counts with a bigger sensor capturing higher quality pictures and a camera in the back with a higher resolution.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Google Pixel 4 XL is also by far the cheapest one, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.