Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| 2015-11-02 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 649.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has an overall score of 89, which is better than the Google Nexus 6P's 80.3 general score. The Google Pixel 5 construction is way newer and lighter than Google Nexus 6P's, although it's also just a little bit thicker. Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Google Nexus 6P features a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher number of pixels in each inch of screen and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution. The Google Nexus 6P and the Google Pixel 5 have extremely similar storage for games and applications, they have exactly the same internal storage.
The Google Pixel 5 features greater battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6P, because it has an 18% more battery size. Google Pixel 5 features a bit better camera than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lower 12.2 mega pixels resolution, a smaller sensor taking less light and duller colors and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light photography and video.
The Google Pixel 5 is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.