Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-11-02 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Aluminum | Glass and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 649.00 | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| AMOLED | LTPO |
| 515 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is much better than Google Nexus 6P, getting a 92.1 score against 80.3. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design construction is way newer than the Google Nexus 6P's, but it's notably heavier and somewhat thicker. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a superior performance than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a larger amount of RAM.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has an incredibly better display than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a just a bit lower pixel density and a quite lower resolution of 1280 x 2800px, it also counts with a bigger screen. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design shoots way better photographs and videos than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, faster video frame rates, a lot bigger camera aperture and a way bigger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because it has more internal memory capacity. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 62% more battery capacity.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a lot more expensive than the Google Nexus 6P, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.