Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2015-11-02 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 649.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P is just a bit better than LG G7 Fit, getting a overall score of 80.3 against 77. Even though Google Nexus 6P is much older and heavier than LG G7 Fit, it's body is still a little bit thinner. The Google Nexus 6P counts with just a little better hardware performance than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
LG G7 Fit counts with a brighter screen than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3120, a little more pixels per inch of screen and a little bit larger display. Google Nexus 6P takes just a bit better photos and videos than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a lot less MP back camera, it also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a bigger diafragm aperture.
LG G7 Fit counts with a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Google Nexus 6P features a little longer battery lifetime than LG G7 Fit, because it has 3450mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.