Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2015-11-02 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 649.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ is slightly better than the Google Nexus 6P, having a score of 81 against 80.3. LG G7 ThinQ is a noticeably newer and a little lighter phone than the Google Nexus 6P, but it is also just a little bit thicker. The LG G7 ThinQ has a more vivid display than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a little bit greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen, a slightly higher 1440 x 3120px resolution and a little bit larger display.
The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a much better memory to install games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG G7 ThinQ features a little bit better processing power than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
LG G7 ThinQ shoots clearer pictures and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a way tinier camera sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG G7 ThinQ also counts with faster 60 fps video frame rates, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photos and videos and a much more MP back facing camera.
Google Nexus 6P features just a bit better battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 15 percent larger battery size.
The LG G7 ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.