Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-11-02 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Aurora black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 649.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ has a score of 82.7, which is a bit better than the Google Nexus 6P's overall score of 80.3. Even though the LG G8X ThinQ is noticeably newer than the Google Nexus 6P, it's a bit heavier and thicker. The Google Nexus 6P features a slightly better looking screen than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better display density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
LG G8X ThinQ features much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG G8X ThinQ features a bit superior CPU than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
LG G8X ThinQ features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 16% bigger battery capacity. LG G8X ThinQ has just a bit better camera than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a tinier sensor capturing lower quality videos and photos, a lower (4K) video definition and a camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the LG G8X ThinQ is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.