Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-11-02 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Holographic white |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 649.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P is a bit better than LG Stylo 6, having an 80.3 score against 76.7. Although the Google Nexus 6P is incredibly older than LG Stylo 6, it's body is thinner and lighter. The LG Stylo 6 has just a little better hardware performance than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG Stylo 6 also has more RAM.
The Google Nexus 6P counts with a little sharper screen than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher display pixel density. LG Stylo 6 has a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Google Nexus 6P takes clearer videos and photos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a back facing camera with a worse 12.3 MP resolution and a smaller aperture, it also counts with a much bigger sensor capturing lot higher quality pictures and videos and a much higher video definition. The LG Stylo 6 features a bit superior battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 16 percent greater battery size.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG Stylo 6. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Google Nexus 6P, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the LG Stylo 6, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.