Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2015-11-02 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 649.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is slightly better than the Google Nexus 6P, having a global score of 82.5 against 80.3. LG V30S ThinQ's construction has the same thickness than Google Nexus 6P, but it's somewhat lighter. LG V30S ThinQ features a little bit better performance than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 3 GB more RAM memory.
LG V30S ThinQ features a bit better looking screen than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a little bigger display, a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a just a little better count of pixels in each screen inch. LG V30S ThinQ counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Google Nexus 6P counts with a bit better battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 3450mAh battery capacity. The LG V30S ThinQ and Google Nexus 6P have similar cameras, because although the LG V30S ThinQ has a lot smaller camera sensor, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, it also counts with a camera with a way higher resolution and a larger aperture to take better photography and videos in low light environments.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Nexus 6P, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Nexus 6P. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the LG V30S ThinQ, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Google Nexus 6P, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.