Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2015-11-02 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 649.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is a bit better than Google Nexus 6P, getting a overall score of 81.3 against 80.3. The LG V35 ThinQ design has the same thickness than the Google Nexus 6P, but it's lighter. LG V35 ThinQ features a little better processing power than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ has just a bit better looking display than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a quite better 1440 x 2880px resolution, a quite bigger display and a little bit better quantity of pixels in each inch of display. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a bit better camera than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a way smaller back camera sensor offering a much lower image quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a much better 16 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a larger aperture.
Google Nexus 6P counts with just a bit longer battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 3450mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the LG V35 ThinQ is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.