Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-11-02 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Blue and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 649.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is just a bit better than the Google Nexus 6P, having a score of 87.6 against 80.3. The LG V60 ThinQ is a much newer phone than Google Nexus 6P, but it is heavier and somewhat thicker. Google Nexus 6P counts with a bit better display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per inch in the screen.
LG V60 ThinQ has a much better storage for games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG V60 ThinQ features just a little better processing power than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a very superior battery performance than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a slightly better camera than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a much larger camera sensor, a back camera with a much better 64 megapixels resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography and a much higher video definition.
The LG V60 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.