Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-11-02 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Smoke black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 649.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P has a global score of 80.3, which is just a bit better than Moto G Power's general score of 76.1. The Google Nexus 6P is an a lot older phone than Moto G Power, but it is notably thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. The Google Nexus 6P counts with a bit sharper screen than Moto G Power, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution.
The Google Nexus 6P and the Moto G Power both feature very similar processors, and although the Moto G Power has more RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Moto G Power counts with a little bit better camera than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a smaller sensor offering a lower image quality, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Moto G Power also counts with a camera in the back with lot more megapixels and a bigger aperture.
Moto G Power counts with a greater storage to install games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Moto G Power counts with a much longer battery duration than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3450mAh.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto G Power. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Google Nexus 6P, else you can save some dollars and get the Motorola Moto G Power, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.