Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2015-11-02 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 649.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P is a bit better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, having a score of 80.3 against 77.4. Even being the best in this comparison review, Google Nexus 6P's construction is older, heavier and somewhat thicker than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has 1 GB more RAM.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a little sharper display than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1440 x 2560, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of screen. The Moto Z2 Force Edition features a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Google Nexus 6P features a bit better camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video definition, the Google Nexus 6P also has a better 12.3 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a much larger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Google Nexus 6P features improved battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 3450mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Google Nexus 6P is also by far the cheapest one, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.