Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2015-11-02 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 649.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P is a bit better than Moto Z3, getting an 80.3 score against 77.6. Although it's the best cellphone we are comparing, Google Nexus 6P is a way older, heavier and a little bit thicker cellphone than Moto Z3. Moto Z3 features a bit superior CPU than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Moto Z3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Google Nexus 6P counts with a little bit better display than Moto Z3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per display inch and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Motorola Moto Z3 has a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Google Nexus 6P counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a F2 aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Google Nexus 6P also has a way bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a camera in the back with a higher resolution.
Google Nexus 6P has just a bit longer battery duration than Moto Z3, because it has a 15 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto Z3. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Google Nexus 6P, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Moto Z3, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.