Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-11-02 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 649.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P has an overall score of 80.3, which is a little bit better than the Motorola One Hyper's 79.8 general score. Despite of the fact that Google Nexus 6P is much older than the Motorola One Hyper, it's design is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter. Motorola One Hyper counts with a processor that is just as good as Google Nexus 6P's CPU, and although the Motorola One Hyper has more RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Google Nexus 6P has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better count of pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Motorola One Hyper counts with a superior memory for games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Motorola One Hyper also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Motorola One Hyper has a much better camera than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola One Hyper also has a much higher resolution camera and a bigger aperture. The Motorola One Hyper has just a bit longer battery life than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 16 percent greater battery size.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola One Hyper. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Google Nexus 6P, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola One Hyper, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.