Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2015-11-02 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Blue and Brown |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 649.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision is slightly better than Google Nexus 6P, with a overall score of 80.7 against 80.3. The Motorola One Vision design is newer than Google Nexus 6P's, although it's a little heavier and somewhat thicker. Google Nexus 6P counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a just a little better screen pixel density.
Motorola One Vision features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Motorola One Vision also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB. The Motorola One Vision features a little faster processor than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola One Vision also has a higher amount of RAM.
Motorola One Vision features a battery performance that is just as good as the battery duration in Google Nexus 6P, although the Motorola One Vision also has a 3500mAh battery size. Motorola One Vision captures much better photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Vision also has a way better resolution back-facing camera, a bigger back camera sensor which gives a higher image and video quality and a larger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.