Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-11-02 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 649.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P has an overall score of 80.3, which is slightly better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 overall score. Google Nexus 6P's body is lighter and notably thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The Google Nexus 6P has a little more vivid screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a much greater memory for applications and games than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a little better processing power than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 9 GB more RAM memory.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a very superior battery life than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 45% bigger battery size. The nubia Red Magic 3S shoots way better videos and photos than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a larger aperture, a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels, a larger back camera sensor taking better quality pictures and videos and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Google Nexus 6P costs a bit more than the nubia Red Magic 3S, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.