Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-11-02 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 649.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P is a bit better than nubia Red Magic 5S, getting a general score of 80.3 against 76.2. The Google Nexus 6P is an much older cellphone than nubia Red Magic 5S, but it is a lot thinner and lighter anyway. The Google Nexus 6P counts with a bit better looking screen than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a little better hardware performance than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has 5 GB more RAM. Nubia Red Magic 5S has a way better camera than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a much better video resolution, a much bigger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality, a bigger camera aperture and a much more mega pixels camera.
The nubia Red Magic 5S's memory capacity for applications and games is very similar to Google Nexus 6P's one, they have equal internal memory capacity. Nubia Red Magic 5S has greater battery life than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3450mAh.
Google Nexus 6P costs a little more than the nubia Red Magic 5S, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.