Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2015-11-02 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 649.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a global score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than the Google Nexus 6P's 80.3 global score. Samsung Galaxy A50's body is newer and a little bit lighter than Google Nexus 6P's, although it's also a little bit thicker. Google Nexus 6P counts with a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A50 features a little bit better hardware performance than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a bit better camera than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor taking lower quality videos and images, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A50 also counts with a much better 25 megapixels resolution back camera and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos.
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a bit longer battery performance than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy A50 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.