Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2015-11-02 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | -- |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 649.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has an overall score of 90.7, which is much better than the Google Nexus 6P's 80.3 overall score. Although the Samsung Galaxy A52 is a lot newer than the Google Nexus 6P, it is somewhat thicker and a little heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with just a little better processing power than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Google Nexus 6P counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better pixel amount per inch of screen. The Galaxy A52 takes greater photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A52 also has a way bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality, a larger camera aperture to take better photos and video in low-light situations and a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a much better memory for applications and games than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 has longer battery performance than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.