Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2015-11-02 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | -- |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 649.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is much better than Google Nexus 6P, with a score of 91.3 against 80.3. Galaxy A52 5G is a noticeably newer device than the Google Nexus 6P, but it is a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker. Google Nexus 6P features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display density and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a little bit better performance than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has 3 GB more RAM. The Galaxy A52 5G has much more memory to store more games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G captures much clearer photographs and videos than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot better quality videos and pictures, a bigger aperture to take better photography and video in poorly lited situations and a much more mega pixels camera in the back.
The Galaxy A52 5G features improved battery life than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.