Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-11-02 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 649.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s is better than Google Nexus 6P, with a score of 91.1 against 80.3. The Samsung Galaxy A52s is a noticeably newer device than the Google Nexus 6P, although it's a bit heavier and thicker. Google Nexus 6P features a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher display density.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a very superior storage for applications and games than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a little faster processing unit than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has 3 GB more RAM.
Galaxy A52s captures a lot better pictures and videos than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A52s also has a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back, a bigger aperture to take better captures in poorly lited environments and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a much better image and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with improved battery performance than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.