Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2015-11-02 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 649.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P has a score of 80.3, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A6's 75.8 general score. Google Nexus 6P is a much older and just a bit heavier device than Galaxy A6, but Google was able to make it a little bit thinner anyway. The Google Nexus 6P counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy A6, because it has a lot better pixels quantity per inch of screen, a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a bit larger screen.
Google Nexus 6P counts with just a bit better performance than Galaxy A6. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 3 GB RAM. Google Nexus 6P features a little bit better memory for games and applications than Galaxy A6, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The Google Nexus 6P counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy A6, because although it has a way less mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a larger camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photographs and a lot better (4K) video definition.
The Google Nexus 6P counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a 15 percent larger battery size.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy A6. If you want to save some money, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A6, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.