Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-11-02 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 649.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P is a little bit better than the Galaxy A70, getting an 80.3 score against 76.9. The Google Nexus 6P design is just a bit lighter and a bit thinner than the Galaxy A70, although it was released 4 years before. Google Nexus 6P counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy A70 counts with a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A70 also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A70 features a little faster processor than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A70 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with longer battery performance than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 30 percent larger battery capacity. The Google Nexus 6P features a much better camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photography, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the Google Nexus 6P also counts with a larger back camera sensor.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A70. If you prefer to save some money, you can get Galaxy A70, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.