Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-11-02 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 649.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is a lot better than Google Nexus 6P's overall score of 80.3. The Galaxy Fold construction is newer and a little thinner, but also way heavier than the Google Nexus 6P. Galaxy Fold features a bit more powerful processor than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Google Nexus 6P has a little more vivid display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch of screen. Galaxy Fold captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a smaller sensor which offers a worse photo and video quality, a lower 12 mega pixels resolution back camera and a lower video definition, it also counts with a lot larger diafragm aperture for better images and videos in poorly lited situations.
Galaxy Fold features a way bigger storage for apps and games than Google Nexus 6P, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Fold counts with improved battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 4380mAh battery size.
Galaxy Fold is way more expensive than Google Nexus 6P, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.