Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2015-11-02 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 649.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a bit better than the Google Nexus 6P, getting a score of 80.4 against 80.3. Although Galaxy Note Fan Edition is just a little bit thicker than the Google Nexus 6P, it's just a little lighter and newer. Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a bit faster CPU than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has more RAM.
Google Nexus 6P and Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition both feature really similar screens, they have the same resolution of 1440 x 2560, a screen with the same size and the same amount of pixels in each inch of display. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has slightly more storage for games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB.
The Google Nexus 6P captures just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Google Nexus 6P also counts with a larger back camera sensor which provides a higher image and video quality and a higher 12.3 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
Google Nexus 6P counts with a little better battery life than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 3450mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is also cheaper than the other phone, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.