Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2015-11-02 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 649.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P is slightly better than the Galaxy Note3, having a score of 80.3 against 77.7. Although the Google Nexus 6P is just a bit heavier than the Galaxy Note3, it's thinner and also incredibly newer. Google Nexus 6P has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have 3 GB of RAM, the Google Nexus 6P also has 4 more cpu cores (although they are slower).
The Google Nexus 6P features a little sharper display than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Google Nexus 6P also has a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater screen pixels density. The Google Nexus 6P has a little bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note3, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Google Nexus 6P has a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a 3450mAh battery capacity. The Google Nexus 6P captures a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has a worse resolution back camera and a lower video resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better captures and videos in poorly lited environments and a much larger camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.