Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2015-11-02 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 649.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note4, having an 80.3 score against 77.6. Google Nexus 6P's design is newer and thinner, but just a bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Note4. Samsung Galaxy Note4 and Google Nexus 6P both count with very similar displays, both have the same display density, a screen with the same size and exactly the same resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Google Nexus 6P counts with a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Google Nexus 6P has a bit better processor than Galaxy Note4. Both of them have a 3 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy Note4 and Google Nexus 6P count with incredibly similar cameras, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note4 has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for shooting images in poorly lited environments and a smaller camera sensor which gives a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video quality, it also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher 16 mega-pixels resolution.
Google Nexus 6P has just a little better battery performance than Galaxy Note4, because it has 3450mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.