Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-11-02 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 649.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 is better than the Google Nexus 6P, having an 88.3 score against 80.3. The Galaxy S10 body is way newer and somewhat lighter than Google Nexus 6P's, but it is a little bit thicker. The Samsung Galaxy S10 features a little sharper screen than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3040, a bit bigger display and a bit greater count of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a superior memory for games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB. The Galaxy S10 counts with a bit better CPU than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 also has 5 GB more RAM.
Galaxy S10 counts with a slightly better camera than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a back-facing camera with a worse 12 megapixels resolution, a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a smaller camera sensor shooting worse quality photographs, it also counts with a much larger aperture for better low-light photos and video.
Google Nexus 6P has a little better battery performance than Galaxy S10, because it has 3450mAh of battery capacity against 3400mAh.
The Galaxy S10 is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.