Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-11-02 | -- |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | -- |
| 6.28 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | -- |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 649.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 is just a bit better than the Google Nexus 6P, with a score of 82.6 against 80.3. Samsung Galaxy S25's design is extremely lighter and much thinner than Google Nexus 6P. The Galaxy S25 counts with a more vivid screen than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a bit worse quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bit larger screen.
The Galaxy S25's storage to store more apps and games is just as good as the Google Nexus 6P one, both of them have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Google Nexus 6P has a very superior processing unit than Galaxy S25, although it has 5 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy S25 has a little longer battery duration than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 16% more battery size. The Samsung Galaxy S25 features a lot better camera than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a larger diafragm aperture, a way more MP back camera and a way higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Although Samsung Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs more than Google Nexus 6P, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Nexus 6P. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S25, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Google Nexus 6P, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.