Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-11-02 | -- |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | -- |
| 6.28 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | -- |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 649.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a score of 90.7, which is much better than Google Nexus 6P's 80.3 score. Galaxy S25 Ultra's body is way lighter and a lot thinner than the Google Nexus 6P. Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a more vivid display than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a just a little lower display pixel density, it also counts with a little higher 1440 x 3088 resolution and a bigger screen.
The Google Nexus 6P counts with a much better hardware performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 9 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much longer battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a greater camera than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a much more mega pixels back camera, a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography, a much higher video definition and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.