Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2015-11-02 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Black |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 649.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 515 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P has a general score of 80.3, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's overall score of 80.1. Google Nexus 6P's construction is incredibly lighter and notably thinner than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even though it was released many years before. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little bit better performance than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little bit better display than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also counts with a bit better screen density. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has greater battery performance than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 30% larger battery capacity. Google Nexus 6P features a much better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video resolution, a back facing camera with more MP and a bigger camera sensor which gives a better image and video quality.
The Google Nexus 6P not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.