Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-11-02 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Black |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 649.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro has a general score of 81, which is a little bit better than Google Nexus 6P's 80.3 score. Galaxy XCover Pro's design is extremely newer than Google Nexus 6P's, although it is somewhat heavier and noticeably thicker. Google Nexus 6P counts with just a bit better screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a better memory for games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit better processing unit than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
Google Nexus 6P shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a way worse 12.3 MP resolution camera in the back and a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for taking photographs or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor which offers a lot better photo and video quality and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Galaxy XCover Pro has longer battery life than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity instead of 3450mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Galaxy XCover Pro is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.