Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2015-11-02 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 649.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is much better than the Google Nexus 6P's overall score of 80.3. The Galaxy Z Flip is a newer and just a bit thinner device than the Google Nexus 6P, although it is just a little bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit better processing power than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has 5 GB more RAM.
The Google Nexus 6P counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher screen pixels density and a slightly better 1440 x 2560px resolution. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip captures clearer pictures and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a worse video resolution, a smaller camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors and a camera with less MP, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
The Galaxy Z Flip features a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Google Nexus 6P, because it has more internal memory. Google Nexus 6P features just a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 3450mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Nexus 6P, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Nexus 6P. If you want to save some money, you can buy Google Nexus 6P, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.