Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-11-02 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 649.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 has an overall score of 85.6, which is slightly better than Google Nexus 6P's overall score of 80.3. Even though the Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a bit heavier than Google Nexus 6P, it's just a little thinner and a lot newer. The Google Nexus 6P counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of display and a bit higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a little faster processing unit than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has 5 GB more RAM. Google Nexus 6P shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a more mega-pixels back camera.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 and Google Nexus 6P feature very similar storage for games and applications, both of them have exactly the same internal memory. The Google Nexus 6P has a bit better battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 3450mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Nexus 6P, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Nexus 6P. If you want to save some money, you can buy Google Nexus 6P, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.