Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-11-02 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 649.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is better than Google Nexus 6P's general score of 80.3. Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a much newer and a little bit thinner phone than the Google Nexus 6P, but it's also a little heavier. Google Nexus 6P counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater pixel density and a slightly better 1440 x 2560px resolution.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a much better storage for apps and games than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Google Nexus 6P counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5 percent greater battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G captures just a bit better videos and photos than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a worse video quality, a back-facing camera with a lower resolution and a tinier sensor shooting lower quality videos and images, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Galaxy Z Flip 5G is also a bit cheaper, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.