Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2015-11-02 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 649.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P is a bit better than the Xperia Z4v, having an 80.3 score against 78.8. The Google Nexus 6P body is thinner but somewhat heavier than the Xperia Z4v, and both of them were released only a few months apart. The Sony Xperia Z4v features a bit more powerful processor than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 3 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores, the Sony Xperia Z4v also has an additional graphics processing unit.
The Xperia Z4v has a better screen than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution, the Xperia Z4v also counts with a quite better screen density. Google Nexus 6P counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Xperia Z4v, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Google Nexus 6P counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Xperia Z4v, because it has a 15 percent larger battery capacity. The Xperia Z4v has a little bit better camera than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same video definition, the same 30 fps video frame rate, a same size back-facing camera sensor and the same aperture, the Xperia Z4v also has a lot better resolution back facing camera.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xperia Z4v, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xperia Z4v. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Google Nexus 6P, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Xperia Z4v, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.