Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2015-11-02 | 2018-04-20 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.36 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 649.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark is a little bit better than Google Nexus 6P, with a general score of 80.4 against 80.3. The Xiaomi Black Shark is a a lot newer device than the Google Nexus 6P, although it's a little bit heavier and thicker. The Xiaomi Black Shark has a bit more powerful CPU than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark also has 5 GB more RAM memory.
The Google Nexus 6P counts with a little bit better display than Xiaomi Black Shark, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher pixel density. The Google Nexus 6P shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Google Nexus 6P also counts with a camera with more mega pixels and a much larger camera sensor.
The Xiaomi Black Shark has as much storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the Google Nexus 6P, both have the same internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Black Shark has a little better battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 16% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.