Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 76.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| 2015-11-02 | 2017-04-28 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 5.72 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 649.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2457 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | -- |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 3350mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P has a score of 80.3, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 6's 76.5 global score. The Google Nexus 6P is a just a bit heavier device than Xiaomi Mi 6, but both of them are equally thin. The Xiaomi Mi 6 counts with a bit superior CPU than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Mi 6 also has more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Mi 6 has a little more vivid display than Google Nexus 6P, although it has a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, a just a little lower quantity of pixels per display inch and a little bit smaller screen. The Xiaomi Mi 6 features as much storage to store more apps and games as Google Nexus 6P, they have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Google Nexus 6P counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 6, because it has a 3450mAh battery size. Google Nexus 6P captures a bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 6, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for capturing photos and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Google Nexus 6P also counts with a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a camera with more MP.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Xiaomi Mi 6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Mi 6. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Google Nexus 6P, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Xiaomi Mi 6, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.